32. Another Parable ~ The Prodical Son with Implications
"It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this
thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found." ~
Luke 15:32
The parables of the Savior were given having various levels of understanding,
from the rudimentry surface level of the mere story of the parable and its
moral application to deep hiden meanings applied to the particulars of the
gospel and the gospel plan. On the surface the parable of the Prodical Son is
but one of a son gone astray who has come back and the father's wellingness
to forgive him. In relation to God and man, it illustrates the Love of God
for his children and his willingness to receive them back into the fold in
they will but return and repent. Yet Nephi has taught another principle in
respect to the scriptures which will aid in discovering even another meaning
in the parable of the Prodical Son. And that is that we are to liken all
scriptures unto ourselves. And as we apply them particularly unto ourselves
there is still more meaning to be found. In Nephi's case, he was of the
tribe of Joseph and he likend particularly the scripture of Isaiah to he and
his people, especially in that they were the 'promised remnant' or the tribe
of Joseph to whom many blessings had been given. Thus in Nephi's applying
the scriptures particularly to his people as a remnant of the tribe of Joseph,
Nephi was able to find great meanings of application.
This we will now do with the parable of the Prodical Son. We will particularly
apply it to ourselves and in particular to that tribe of Israel to which we
belong, the tribe of Ephraim, which is the representative tribe of the
Kingdom of Israel as opposed to the Kingdom of Judah. Thus when the parable
of the Prodical Son is likened unto the history of the Hebrews, the two
sons of this 'certain man' become Judah as the elder son and Ephraim as the
younger son.
" ... A certain man [God] had
two sons [Judah and
Ephraim]: And the younger [Ephraim]
of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that
falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living. And not many days
after the younger son [Ephraim] gathered all
together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his
substance with riotous living." Luke 15:11-13
Now it is not for parables to be applied in every detail but in general. It
a parable it taken too literal then the various applications of it is lost
to the attempting to satisfy every detail. It is therefore here but in general
applied that the tribe of Ephraim, representing Israel, did depart from God,
being the Father, taking his inheritance. And he did squander it in
worshipping false gods and thus in riotous living, until he had wasted his
inheritance away until there became a famine in the land for the want of the
word of God (v14). And indeed Ephraim did travel to a far country, Assyria,
to who, once his inheritance was so squandered, Ephraim did effect an aliance,
joining himself to a citizen of that country (v15), that is with Asyria, and
he so became associated with swine or that which in the view of the Hebrews
that which was unclean.
Now the degenerate conditions of the prodical can will be compared to the
various fates of position which scatered Israel, the is Ephraim, did
experience no longer having the richness of the blessings of the bread of
the Father upon which to trive. And it is also significant that the desire
of the prodical son became that of wanting to become a servant unto his
Father, that he might so come again and partake of the fulness of the Father.
And when the prodical did return to the Father, repenting and to again
become of the household of the Father, even as a servant of the Father, the
reception of the Father was to welcome him with open arms and with great love
(v. 17-20).
"And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against
heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son. But the
father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe
[The Temple Clothes], and put it on him;
and put a ring [A Sign of a Covenant] on his
hand, and shoes on his feet;" ~ Luke 15:21-22
The Father accepted the his prodical's repentance and accepted him fully into
his household to the extent of granting unto him the full blessing of the
house, dressing him in the clothing of the house which we may infer to be the
robes of the temple and did place his signant, his ring, upon the hand of the
prodical which can be interpreted as the Covenant of God. And not next comes
that which ties it together in respect to the topic of this text. The killing
of teh fatted calf is but the symbolism of the sacrifice of the Son of God
by which the prodical will be restored to the table of the Father.
And that which also becomes particularly applicable is that which is stated
in verse 24. It states, 'this my son was dead, and is
alive again'. This in itself has a dualistic application. In
ancient times, the covenant line had become dead. Elimelech had died and his
two sons, Chilion and Mahlon as well without seed. The covenant line of
Ephraim was literally dead. And it was through the performance of their
distance relative Boaz, that that seed was restored. This was an ancient
inference. And of course there is the more near applicable application that
Ephraim in being scattered had become dead in respect to the things of God,
and he was again to be made live by the killing of the fatted calf, the
atonement of the Lord, unto become alive again in Christ.
Also it states 'he was lost, and is
found'. Cerainly the tribe or tribes of Ephraim as Israel were
lost. And here in lies a great tie-in. In the ministry of Jesus Christ he
so stated to his Apostles that he was sent to none but the 'Lost Tribes of
Israel'. This implies that Jesus Christ WAS NOT sent unto the Jews for they
were not lost as to their identity though perhaps they were then lost as to
righteousness. But in relationship to the parable, Judah was NOT lost. Judah
was the elder son which had stayed at home and was the heir apparant to the
Father's house. This is precisely the supposed position that Judah was in. They
supposed that they had prevailed in God and were indeed the heir to the
covenant. And this even though the Lord had said by the prophet Jeremiah that
Ephraim was his 'firstborn' of the covenant (Jeremiah 31:9).
" ... I am not sent but unto the lost
sheep of the house of Israel." Matthew 15:24
Now the 'the lost sheep of the house'
of this Certain Man, the Father, was Ephraim not Judah. And as the Lord also
taught, 'I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.' (Luke
5:32). Not that the Jewish were 'righteous' but they supposed themselves to
be and they would find fault with the Lord when he would eat with and
associate sinners, and publicans, and those with whom was not lawful for a
'Jew' to so associate with. This would have been the situation of the 'lost
son'. It is further significant that the same chapter of Luke 15 in which
the parable of the Prodical Son follows is includes 'The Parable of the
Lost Sheep', the Lost Sheep which would be presented as the 'Prodical Ephraim'.
And also in the chapter is that parable of Lost Piece of Silver. Of the
10 pieces, that which would have been the tribe of Ephraim, was lost, and the
women, the church, labored hard to find it.
So here now is the tie-in to the topic of Ephraim being the ancestor of
Christ. Jesus Christ WAS NOT sent but unto 'the lost sheep of the house of
Israel'. Judah was NOT lost, Ephraim was. Jesus' purpose of his mission was
to bring his gospel to the 'lost sheep of Israel', and that was Ephraim and
his companions. Why was Jesus NOT SENT unto the Jews? Simply stated, 'They
were NOT the 'Covenant Seed' in whom the promises remained (D&C 27:10). Those covenant promises did but
remain and were preserved in and through Joseph and his seed, the covenant
seed. Jesus was not sent unto the Jews. Quite the opposite. He was sent to
condemn the Jews and to be crucified of them, the only nation of people
wicked enough to so crucify their Lord. Though they had usurped to the
position and claimed him, they rejected him and crucified him. And it would
be to Ephraim that the gospel would be taken, that is the world in which
Ephraim, as the Lost Sheep of Israel', had been scattered. In deed, He is the
'good shepherd' and he knows his sheep and he is known of his own, and it is
his own for whom he did lie down his life' John 10:14-15. And in the case of
the parable of the Prodical Son, it was for the restoring of that son which
was 'lost' for which the life of the fatted calf was given, the fatted calf
representing Jesus Christ.
Again, alone, this parable proves nothing but interesting coincidence. But
coupled with all the other evidences concerning the ties between Jesus Christ
and Ephraim, it is one more nail in the completed design that Jesus is the
same as Messiah ben Joseph.