87. The Threads of Joseph and Ephraim in the Psalms
"Thou hast with thine arm redeemed
thy people, the sons of Jacob and Joseph.
Selah." ~ Psalms 77:15
Now before we get into an exploration of this and the other references in the
Psalms to Joseph and Ephraim, it ought to be first re-established as to why
we must search these things out. Moses, the writer, author and original
compiler of the first five books of the Old Testament was told by the Lord
that many of his words would be esteemed 'as naught' and that many of them
would be taken from the record which he should write (Moses 1:41). This is
also consistant with what the Book of Mormon teaches concerning the records
of the Jews (See 1 Nephi 13:26-29, 32, 34-35, 40; 1 Nephi 14:23). Joseph
Smith taught that he believed the Bible to be the word of God but with a
very pointed qualification, that he believed it as it was first written by
the original writers, the prophets of God. And he further stated that many
errors had entered in and that designing men had purposefully changed and
removed portions of the writings. Of course, the Jews, as well as Israel,
have long pursecuted the prophets of God, putting them to death and treating
their words and writings as naught. Thus much has been lost and purposefully
altered. Yet truth is most difficult to erase entirely from such pages.
Thus in the 'treads of the Psalms' there well might be surviving passages
concerning the relationship between Christ and the House of Joseph.
Now in some defense of the Jewish position, it ought to be remembered that
when the Bible was being compiled and salvaged in the land and captivity of
Babylon and since that time, Israel and Joseph, that is Ephraim, had long
passed by the way being scattered. And the Jews in their mind could well
have most honestly determined that they alone had prevailed in the Lord and
that much which had been written concerning the House of Joseph was not
longer in force. And after all, the mindset and attitude of the Jew was
Jewish and not of the house of Joseph but of Judah, and of the family of Leah
not Rachel.
So now with this in mind, that one well might expect that they would have
to finely comb through the records of the Jews to find that which pertains
to the families of the others tribes, particularly concerning Joseph, Judah's
rival as to Judah's desires of usurption. And so it is also the case of
Joseph's and Jacob's son of the covenant, Ephraim and his brother Manasseh.
And thus we return to this topic's beginning reference of Psalms 77:15.
Now when Psalms 77:15 states that the Lord has redeemed his people, the sons
of Jacob and Joseph, there are only two sons which qualify of being sons to
both these men exclusively, and that is Ephraim and Manasseh because that
Jacob did adopt them in the place of Rueben and Simeon as his firstborn sons
in Israel. Thus this verse which connects the the redemption of the Lord's
people, 'thy people' with Ephraim and Manasseh seems to be an exculsive
application to the sons of Joseph who Jacob did adopt. It also seems to be
in parallel that the sons of Joseph as well as Jacob, meaning Ephraim and
Manasseh are paralleled with being 'the Lord's strength among the people.
This is seeming confirmed by another thread from Psalms which we will now
cover.
" ... Ephraim also is the strength of mine head; Judah is my
lawgiver;" ~ Psalms 60:7 & 108:8
Now some will say that Judah is the lawgiver through Christ, Christ being of
Judah. This may be correct in that Christ has a dual ancestry which we are
covering. But there is another aspect to Judah being the 'lawgiver' and that
is in the fact that it the Jews who have given the world the Biblical record
and testaments of God. In providing that record, Judah has given the world
God's law. But in respect to Ephraim being the strength of 'mine head', there
is only 'one head' in God unto this world and that is Jesus Christ. And if
Ephraim his the strength of that head, that is through Ephraim the strength
of God's 'Right Arm' doth come, and God's 'Right Arm' is Christ. This Ephraim
seems to be implied as the true ancestrial connection of Christ to the
everlasting covenant of the priesthood, that everlasting covenant of God,
which is in and through Christ. It is hard to see how that can be separated.
On the one hand Judah may or may not be implicated as associated with Christ
being of Judah, but certainly Ephraim is for sure so implicated as there is
only one head, Christ and the strength of that head, is his covenant
ancestry of Ephraim.
"Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, thou that leadest Joseph like
a flock; thou that dwellest between the cherubims, shine forth. Before
Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh stir up thy strength, and come and save
us." ~ Psalms 80:1-2
Now, after associating the strength of the 'head' who is Christ as being
Ephraim, it is most appropriate to consider Psalms 80. The 'Shepard of
Israel' is Jesus Christ and Jacob in Joseph's blessing did state in Genesis
49:24 'that thence [from Joseph] would come the shepherd and rock of Israel.'
That Jesus Christ stands at the head of Joseph to lead that flock of Joseph
has a very particular significance in that the New Jerusalem is to be built
up unto the remnant of the house of Joseph in the land of Joseph in America
(See Ether 13:6-10). And Jesus' Second Coming will be unto the New Jerusalem,
is being that city which should come down out of heaven with the Lord at his
coming (Ether 13;3). And as Wilford Woodruff so taught, Joseph Smith the
prophet of this last dispensation is busily preparing that those of this
last dispensation, particularly being a 'pure Ephraimite' and the Church
having been the fulfilling of the Covenant of Abraham in and through Ephraim,
to come down with the Lord at that coming to that New Jerusalem. From this
is may be concluded that the 'Shepherd of Israel', who came thence from
Joseph, stands at the head of the people of Joseph, in the land of Joseph,
he being the legal and rightful heir of Joseph and the covenant to take such
a position in the household of Ephraim, Jospeh and the family of Rachel.
And that is the significance of the 'strength' being before those son's of
Rachel so mentioned, Ephraim and Manasseh being of Joseph with Benjamin so
being named as a part of the household of Rachel, not Leah. But not all the
threads of the Psalms seem to favor Joseph, so in honesty we will now consider
Psalms 78.
"Moreover he refused the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not
the tribe of Ephraim: But chose the tribe of Judah, the mount Zion which he
loved." ~ Psalm 78:67-68
So what of this? This does have a very Jewish perspective about it. And that
is just one of the points. It was written and kept by the Jews. Why not,
with Ephraim, the is Israel gone, would not Judah so consider themselves to
be 'chosen' over Ephraim. But there in lies the next point. Why would Judah
have to particularly point out that they were chosen and NOT
Ephraim if in deed Ephraim had no such claim in it. This is a defensive
posture, that with many other sons of Jacob, would Judah so particularly
pit itself against the youngest of Joseph, except that the youngest of Joseph
did have such a claim in it?
Now in truth King David did remove the tabernacle out of Ephraim and did
bring it to Jerusalem, But Jerusalem by the division of Josphua was not
Judah's, it was Benjamin's, the youngest son of Rachel, not Leah. And it was
Ephraim who sinned and failed to chose the Lord, for the last anointed King
of Israel was of the tribe of Ephraim, being Jeroboam of the prophet Nathan.
And it was King David, who after being restored to his throne, being
opposed by the Jews under his son's rebellion—being so restored by the
hand of Ephraim or Israel—that did dishonor that supporting hand in
choosing Judah over Ephraim. And at this date, King David with his multiple
sins could hardly be considered the voice of the Lord upon the matter. And
though Judah did claim David by blook kinship, it was Israel or Ephraim who
had the greater claim in David. That is David was the legal and rightful
heir of the covenant through his being the son of the house of Elimelech and
Mahlon according to the Law of God. Thus it was actually David who was
rejecting his postion in the linage of the covenant, having already been so
dropped from it because of his sins in the eyes of the Lord, who did the
chosing of Jerusalem which had been 'stolen' by the Jews from Benjamin, and
the moving moving of the tabernacle to Jerusalem was also by the hand of that
same sinful King David, and not by the hand of the Lord, though at the time
Ephraim was likely not any more worthy of it. So this is a very Jewish
perspective and so reported from a very Jewish slant upon the actual facts
of the matter.
And there is one more particular which seems worthy of mention. Though
Jerusalem has been given to be that 'mount Zion' as celibrated by the Jews,
there is also another Zion, which is the Lord's Zion of the latter-days
which is not in the old Jerusalem at all, but in America and that truly
selected land choice above all other lands, and favored above all other
land and scripturally support to be choosen of the Lord above all other
such mounts, Zions and lands. And this is the land of Joseph. And the Lord
has scripturally so chose it, it truely being that mount Zion which he
loved. Thus hath the Lord truly chosen Judah over Joseph as prescribe by the
Jewish record? It would seem today that the Lord has 'refused' the tabernacle
of the Jews which was defiled by the Jews even after the Lord's two cleansings
of it in his mortality. The Jews also 'rejected' Christ, in that they
crucified him. There is a true mutual rejection. And today there are over
a hundred 'Temples' of the Lord which are not so selfishly and pridefully
reserved but unto one people, but are spread over the face of the whole earth
by the hand of Ephraim's latter-day leadership. So in truth, whose
'tabernacles' have been refused and whose have been accepted unto the Lord?
Are they not the 'tabernacles' or Temples of Joseph? And has not the Lord
chosen the tribe of Ephraim and NOT the tribe of Judah? But then Ephraim is
of the mind that salvation is unto all people, even the Jews. So the Jews
do not stand rejected forever as the Jews would so promote by their position
against Joseph and Ephraim as so set out in their Psalm 78.