P O L I T I C S
by Don R. Hender
At least every four years my
interests turn to Politics. Actually more often, but not too extreme that
I have to get involved in every little fray. But certainly, every four years
I just have to get out and vote for the course of our nation. I hope that I
am not just funny that way. I hope that our national interests is of
importance to the majority of Americans. And I mean to emphasize 'national
interests' and the concept of 'Americans'. For there are a number of key
items that I watch for in these nation shaping elections.
Not necessarily in a set order of priority, they things I seem to look for
as such as a) Maintaining the American Standard, b) The Role of 'Big
Brother', c) National Moral Commitments, d) The Economy, e) Foreign Relations
& Policies, f) What Is Best for America—The People. There are others
and from time to time they also come into play. Now these items are not
necessarily mutually exclusive. There will be matters in which they will and
do over lap. But certainly as a matter of a 'laundry list', I think that
these six make the check list, at least to start with.
Maintaining the American Standard
Beyond such goals as maintaining the general commitments to our Constitution
and all those things which have made America Great, we ought to look at those
very basic premises upon which America was founded. Among these are our
commitment to God and to our Country. We are a 'God Fearing
Country' and we ought not to ever forget that the first Americas came here
seeking 'Religious Freedom' to worship God according to the reasonable
dictates of their own minds upon the matter. Traditionally Christianity is
that particular leading religion, but in the course of America, all reasonable
religious tolerances ought to be maintained.
We need to also maintain our commitment to the dual standards of 'Liberty'
and 'Justice'. 'Freedom' is not merely a right to do whatever an individual
thinks to do, there is a responsibility to the Laws of Justice which must
equally be considered.
The Role of 'Big Brother' There are
a few items wherein the Federal Government ought to be involved. But the key
matter here is the need to keept the Federal Government out of what ought to
be that which is governed and decided locally upon a state by state basis.
The 'One Law Fits All' syndrome is a dangerous matter which breeds big
government and little people. Maintaining a national government wherein the
states retain the rights to govern themselves as much as possible and where
individual communities are able to do the same is immportant. Big central
government is costly and avoids not only the 'one size fits all' but the very
dangerous possibility of all must comply to such a national law which is not
fair to each state and community and actually takes away such 'individaul
freedoms' that ought to be left to city and state and not regulated on a
national level.
So as a general rule, the Federal Government's role is to 'keep out' and
'stay small', leaving community and state matters to the state and local
governements. What has become one of the political tactics of the day is to
'threaten' 'needed' Federal Government programs to be cut when seeking to
expand the budget, rather than cutting those special interests and 'sacred
cow' programs which would really reduce big Federal Government and really
and truely reduce the budget without cutting the real vital national business
items.
National Moral Commitments In our
world of today where such such guiding moral laws such as the Ten Commandments
are being challenged and taken out of our governing institutions, where does
government go to set and maintain its moral commitments? Without such moral
commitments upon which a society safely is established, the crumbling of
society into ruin begins. Where is justice without law and where is law
without moral values upon which to build it? The three major religion arenas
of the world have a basis in the Old Testament and the Law of Moses. Even
those who might be divided out usually have some basic code of moral conduct
upon which they were structured. Just because that code connects to religion
is no reason to abandon it. Such has been the true basis of societies for
ages. To remove and ignore the 'moral code' of a culture is the beginnings
of its downfall. And when laws are no longer made by such guiding principles
of 'right' and 'wrong' what is left? I suppose that one real question is, 'Is
there enough moral fiber left in America, the United States, to elect a moral
president, Mitt Romney, or not?' Or does American just want a morally flippant
flip-flopping president who says and does what he thinks will get him elected
or additional political campaign funds? Does America want a man that sways
with the breeze or one that is willing to stand for something that is right
and best for America, having the moral fiber to stick with what is right when
lobbying special interests groups are abounding and pushing for their
individual personal interests first and not necessarily that which is in the
best interest for America? Maybe murder is wrong this election, maybe not so
wrong 'depending' next election? An extreme example? Maybe, maybe not seeing
how things are so gradually progessing to the more liberal views. Maybe is
is going to be more immoral to drink a 7-up in the future than it is to
murder a baby? Or is that the way that it already is today? Perhaps we are not
so morally willing to call a duck a duck because of polictical lobbying that
has already taken place and our country down one of those immoral paths under
the pretence of human rights and freedom of choice? And made is so that it
is not 'policially correct' to speak of it in such direct truths of the matter
anymore. What is an abortion without justified cause, particularly of a full
term baby anymore? Abortion on demand upon the whim of a woman or demand of a
man? Dare we not call it what it is, the murder of an innocent child? A Jesus
or a John the Baptist, whose life becomes unfilfilled because of a selfish
murderous act. Has the child not rights of its own? How do you know what the
life potential of that person is or is not, and by what over riding right
does not take it upon themselves to end another's life?
The Economy The Federal Government
does have a role and responsibility to maintaining a favorable field in which
the Economy may grow to the benefit of the people. However a falsely propt up
Economy will one day fail if it is not founded upon sound finacial footings.
Mere wholesale bail outs of one's buddies of business who have taken advantage
of the law by their shady and unsound finacial dealings is NOT the basis of
a strong economy who's growth is 'real national productivity growth'. That
practice but increases the nation's tax burden, enlarges the national debt
and forms a false foundation for true future economic growth potentials.
Foreign Relations
What Is Best for America—The People
|