After the death of Jacob, if it had not already been the pattern of the brothers of Joseph, it would have been then that the other brothers/tribes of Israel would have looke to Joseph as the responsible birthright son who held by that position the duty to care for the family, all of his father's household. Certainly Joseph had already considered all of the house of Israel/Jacob 'his people' and had already taken upon himself to provide for all of their welfare and livelihood and even that of being their ruler or patriarchal family head standing in the stead of the disceased father Jacob. That was just part of the covenant responsibility of the rightfully recognized 'firstborn son' of the covenant, to act in his father's stead when the father had retired to heaven, as it were. And so did Joseph do and even more so still.

As an accompanying note that can not be resisted here to be said in conjunction with this, it would have fall on Joseph patriarchal head and responsibility to the family, now acting as their head, to also step up and provide for the family any future 'saving messiah' from his posterity as well as JOSEPH WAS THE FAMILY'S PATRIARCH HEAD AND FATHER from that particular time and thus on into the future. The 'right to the ancestry of the Messiah' had just become his right as the recognized Patriarchal Father and leader.

It will be of some benefit that each of the various 'branches' of Joseph be recognizably numbered and kept track of as this review through Jehovah's promises of blessings upon Joseph proceeds.

Joseph, the Patriarchal Heir and the family leader by the birthright, did considered all Isreal as his people, his children and his responsiblity. Joseph would also bear the 'right' to the ancestry of the Messiah, the righteous Branch from David as one of the promised blessings of the firstborn birthright and covenant of Abraham.

1. a righteous branch
2. out of my [Joseph] loins

1. 'and' a prophet [Moses]
2. of Joseph by the 'conjunction and'
3. the 'conjunction' logic is later confirmed
4. (not the Messiah who is called Shilo)
5. this prophet shall deliver my people out of Egypt in the days of bondage

Moses was a Promised Branch of Joseph. Joseph was to be the ancestor of the Messiah. It understandable that there was a need to ensure that Moses was not mistaken as the Messiah who is called Shiloh. Moses who was likened unto Jesus or Jesus was like unto Moses throughout the scriptures: (1 Nephi 22:20-21; 3 Nephi 20:23; Deut. 18:15; Moses 1:6). And he was by some mistaken as the Messiah.

First this becomes important as we now further first speak of Moses, the Second branch spoke of. And as if the conjunction 'and' is not enough to understand that Moses was to be of Joseph's loins, verse 29 will further define these first two branches of Joseph. Yet it ought to be noted that we are by concluding upon Moses first, skipping the verses that did continue on and speak of the Messiah, Jesus Christ.

Follow this scriptural string and it does become obvious that it is Jesus Christ, the Messiah, who this is comparing 'him' to and with Moses here and it is he of the prior three verses.

This implies that Egypt's King at this point [time of Moses] was a descendant of Joseph. Thus there is such missing history. The intermarriage of the seed of Joseph with that of Pharoah and that which would make the 'greater' sin of the 'Pharoah' or king of Egypt that no longer knew Joseph, that is he has denied his own Hebrew heritage***.

*** See note at very end of this item where Zecahariah 10:6-12 is discussed about Ephraim and Eygpt's Septre.

The scriptures consistently compare Jesus and Moses, who are thus likened unto each other. The list of other such scriptures from all of the standard works stand as witnesses to that matter. Those who are anxious to find evidence of Joseph Smith at every turn, have basically reduced Jehovah's—who acts in the name and in the stead of the Father—blessings unto Joseph down to his future descendant Joseph Smith, the latter day prophet and seer of the restoration. And even though they must include Moses, for he is referenced by name, they fail to even take note that Moses is another member of the 'branches of Joseph.' They are missing all but Joseph Smith as to whose blessings and promises are given to Joseph of Ebypt according to his Patriarchal Line of the birthright covenant.

Joseph's promises and blessings just do not jump from Joseph of Egypt all the way down to Joseph of New York, they extend to the whole line from Joseph of Egpt according to his Patriarchal Order responsibilities just as much as they also did and do extend to Abraham, who was also of the line of the Patriarchal Father. Those blessing of Joseph of Egypt, brought Israel into Egypt to secure there temporal salvation does further extend to Moses who delivers them from the eventual captivity of Egypt. And thus Moses is of the Patriarchal lineage from Joseph who deliver's Israel.

And they do also include Jesus Christ, who is the central Patriarchal Father and descendant of Joseph of Egypt as well, whose is mention and whose descrition many but slide on past and also put that upon Joseph Smith. Named last in the post-flood era of the Patriarchal father by whom the promises of the fathers have remained is named Joseph (D&C 27:10). The scriptures do name Joseph in that promise preseaving order of the Patriarchs, and though Ephraim may well have been righteous, it does not seem that it is to him who is looked to as the last great promises preserving Patriarch. It even seems that Ephraim's children may not have remained in the Patriarchal Order, though through him the right to the priesthood did continue just as it did from that root or stem of Jesse who is that Ephrathite/Ephraimite named in the scriptures (1 Samuel 17:12).

And let it be said, that, "Great are the promises and blessing of Joseph of Egypt, for they are those that are of the fathers and beyond." Speak to Joseph when Joseph and his son came unto Jacob to be blessed by him, Jacob said of and unto Joseph the following:

"In delivering my people, thy brethren, from famine which was sore in the land; wherefore the God of thy fathers shall bless thee [Joseph], and the fruit of thy loins, that they shall be blessed above thy brethren, and above thy father's house;" ~ JST | Genesis 48:9

And unto Joseph in his Patriarchal Blessing contained in Genesis 49, Jacob did just following stating that, "From thence is the shepherd, the stone of Israel." Jacob further stated:

"Even by the God of thy father, who shall help thee; and by the Almighty, who shall bless thee with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lieth under, blessings of the breasts, and of the womb:
"The blessings of thy father have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors unto the utmost bound of the everlasting hills: they shall be on the head of Joseph, and on the crown of the head of him that was separate from his brethren." ~ Old Testament | Genesis 49:25-26

And these blessing concern a number of the 'branches of Joseph' even extending to such as the blessings of the nations of the world and Israel, unto every nation, kindred, tongue, and people, which is the work of the LDS Chruch. The fact is that Joseph's promised blessing to his seed, are all those to those who have been and are now positioned to deliver Israel and take the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the world from generation to generation.

So where and what are all these blessings of the progenitors of Jacob that have prevailed, that are "on the crown of the head of him that was separated from his brethren" even Joseph of Egypt? Well one would expect that they would be mentioned to Joseph in that which Jehovah did relate to him as contained in JST Genesis 50 and partly also contained in 2 Nephi 3 where they are reinterated.

Now how was Moses the heir of the house of Joseph and of the promised seed of the promised blessing of the priesthood through Ephraim? Well as cited in JST Genesis 50:29 and as marked highlighted there in yellow, Moses, because he was the adopted son of the daughter of the King, it was to be understood that he was of Joseph's house. Again hid from the known histories and revealed scriptures of the earth except for this brief statement, it does seem that an heir, son of Ephraim, did marry into Pharoah's house and then he or his son did become king. And the only righteous son of the house of Joseph and Ephraim at that particular time of Moses, what that Prince of Egypt, even Moses, who was the adopted son of the king's daughter. Either that or the king's daughter's husband was of such heir of Ephraim himself.

Now Moses, though my adoption, was the righteous heir of the priesthood of the birthright as being son of the house of Joseph. But there was none righteous of his family to bestow it upon him though it was his right. We know that Moses' father-in-law ordained him to the high priesthood, but as to the Keys of the Gathering held by the Father's of the Partriarchal order, it must be presume that it could have likely been one such Father on back to and even possibly even being such as Noah.

And here another question may well be resolved. When upon Mount Sinai, when the children of Israel had degenerated unto worshipping the calf of gold, Jehovah made an offer to Moses. He offered Moses that in his wrath, he would destroy all of the children of Israel he had brought out of Egypt and make his covenant with Moses. Now how could that be? Mose was but a Levite, and not of the birthright lineage of the firstborn Patriarchs. At least that was what was known to be according to the Jewish Bible. Was God stating to Moses that he was ready to expell Joseph and Ephraim from the 'program?' NOT! God could make that offer to Moses honestly because Moses was the adopted son of the house of Joseph and Joseph's son Ephraim and by that right of righteousness, he had right to the priesthood, right to the Keys, and the right to carry forth the promises of the Fathers as a son of Ephraim and Joseph. All these added little tweaks could be placed and built upon as separate items. But there are just so many that are coming forth, that this investigative text must end soon, so they won't be. But thus is the body of evidence that support that Messiah ben Joseph and Messiah ben David are but one and the same Messiah.

One last Note: It would seem that Moses was very clear on the proper succession of the priesthood authority and right, for he kept Hosea or Joshua at his side, the son of Nun, the next heir of the house of Joseph, as righteous son born unto the direct line of Joseph whose right it was. Moses even changed the name of the son of Nun to be that of Jehoshua, mean Jehovah Delivers/Redeems/Saves. If the priesthood birthright was not to be kept in the house of Joseph, why did Moses pick Joshua to be the next prophet and leader of Israel. By this time Israel was stuck in an Aaronic or Levite lesser priesthood base on animal sacrifice

For now back to the other disclaimer of a branch of Joseph not being that of the Messiah, which we had jumped over and passed by to yield Moses' full identity as being of the house of Joseph.

This is speaking of the Kingdom of Israel/Ephraim, who Moses delivered out of Egpyt and the Lord did cause them to be scattered into the nations of the earth. And from such as Europe were they variously broken off.

Lehi devotes one sentence to his group here. Yet they were spoken of by Joseph as well as the Book of Mormon elsewhere states.

1. fruit of his [Joseph] loins
2. righteous branch of house of Joseph of the house of Israel
3. ~ not the Messiah branch ~
4. a branch was broken off
5. Messiah should be made made manifest unto them in the latter days.

This would be 'the branch' from which Joseph Smith would descend from. But from D&C 113:5-6, it would appear that a number of them would come by way of being of Joseph through Jesse, and then lineally back through Ephraim and of the house of Joseph.

It is not the Lehi/Ishmael/Mulek branch. As it had been spoken of by Lehi and Nephi elsewhere so often, Lehi did not include it in his blessing upon his son Joseph but for one single sentence at the beginning of 2 Nephi 3:5. And then Lehi continues by speaking of that latter day branch 'scattered' and 'broken off' as parallel he scriptures of JST Genesis 50:35 and 2 Nephi 3:5 does reveal. In truth this could be number as many such branches of exploration and migration to the Americas, but as to those to whom the Messiah would come and manifest himself unto, it does center in what may be considered the 'LDS Branch' the [3] third such brach of Joseph so far denoted out of Joseph's promises and blessings by the Lord.

And of course, again, the Messiah was not to descend from this scattered branch either as identified in that so revealed by Lehi's paraphrased account. What is of some interest here is that neither the Joseph Smith Translation or the Book of Mormon rendition by Lehi gives what must have been a much fuller listing of thise promises and blessing as given to Joseph by the Lord Perhaps in each case for some same and some separate reasons.

One reason why Joseph Smith would not have either given or be allow to have given a fuller account would be that the Lord still desired for various portions of it to remain 'hid' from the world. For what such reason the Lord would know, but it does fit the pattern of keeping hidden various things before their due time of the Lord as was the 'vision of all' give to the brother of Jared. And one reason why Lehi would not have further reference them all in his blessing to his son Joseph may have been simply that they did not fit his purpose as related in giving his son a blessing to have just perhaps copied over the whole of what was in the plates of brass concering it.

Here comparing JST verse 25 and Lehi verse five, certainly there are differences of inclusions and exclusions in both records. Yet when one considers that both such versions are neither the complete version but authorized abridged version of the Lord's promises to Joseph, it may begin to be considered that Joseph of Egypt also had such a visionary experience of seeing such as did Nephi and as such as must Lehi also have seen out of the vision of Life.

This concludes this 'sub-topic' of this item in which we have been building up to the 'BIG' question and herein so far only setting a foundational base for which to set it upon. Hopefully the Climax will not be of a disappointment in comparison. But it is and will be what it is.

Joseph did speak the truth, Jesus was indeed a 'choice seer' beholding all things before him and as such he would be heir to the keys, both as a righteous Patriach of the Patriarchal Order and as one who would receive and hold the keys of that calling as received upon the mount of transfiguration. And yes Joseph Smith was a 'seer' also, and so entitled to the keys as well.

There are those who have led the Church in their teaching that this 'choice seer' of verses JST 26-27 and Lehi 6-8 are to be joined unto the later separated verses of Lehi 14-16 and JST 33 that do decidedly for sure speak of none other than Joseph Smith. They have meagerly only attributed to the Lord's promises to our Patriarchal Leader and Father Joseph to have only brought forth Joseph Smith as his seed for the purposes and design of providing for Israel and Israels companions since the time Joseph ruled in Egypt. This meager and myopic position IS NOT that taken here.

Rather than meagerly limit our Patriarch Joseph of Egypt to just producing Joseph Smith, it is the stance and position of this text that, in fulfilment of Joseph's Patriarchal duties, his lineage has produced all of the standing despensation heads from his time on out of his promised lienage just as they would also have been of Jacob, Isaac and Abraham before him as so stated by D&C 27:10. Through adoption both Moses and Jesus Christ were of the house and lineage of Joseph of Egypt, the rightful Patriarchal Order ancestor of them and that earthly ancestral lineage by which justified their receiving of the so such controlled priesthood and keys.

Joseph's promises and blessing spoken by the Lord also consisted of his many scattered branches and remnants which have further been brought by the hand of God to the land of promise of Joseph as set out throughout the Book of Mormon. These are also spoken of the deliniated in Joseph's promises spoken to him by the Lord. Cerainly the 'promises' have remained in and through Joseph just as they were by Jacob, Isaac, and Abraham. And this spoken promises are evidenced by a full and correct understanding of JST Genesis 50 and 2 Nephi 3 and also as further taught variously in he Book of Mormon, which is the stick of Joseph.

"And also with Joseph and Jacob, and Isaac, and Abraham, your fathers, by whom the promises remain;" ~ Doctrine and Covenants | Section 27:10, (5-14)

It is just not that certainly 'promises' were pealed off from each of these in line hierarchal Patriarchs of the Patriarchal Order, such as given the Messiah promise to Judah from Jacob that it did not fall to Joseph. It is that the promises did remain in tach down from generation to generation in tach in and through each Patriarchal heir of the coveant right of the firstborn birthright. Isaac inherited all such that was of Abraham from Abraham, Jacob inherited all such that was of Isaac from Isaac, and Joseph inherited all such that was of Jacob from Jacob. The single right of ancestry to the Messiah through the rightful Patriarchal Order lineage WAS NOT pealed off from Jacob so that it did not righteousl and rightful descend through Joseph.

What did happen, which brought the blood of Judah into the veins of the Messiah, was that magnanimous surrogate performance of Boaz that he performed in raising not only seed up unto the dead but also that the inheritance of the dead should remain upon the head of Obed as the first born son of Ruth who was so raised up unto the house of Mahlon and Elimelech who were the heir Ephrathites/Ephraimites of the promised birthright covenant of the firstborn. This text has pointed that out in more detail in various other items as well.

But we need not remain in that darkened condition. Any personal ego aside, Joseph of Egypt, our Patriarchal Father of the Patriarchal Order held that right of the covenant of the Firstborn as a part of the Patriarchal Birthright to be the ancestor of the promised Messiah to come out of that very Patriarchal Order by right. And that the right to the priesthood and its keys may rightfully fall to Him not only by the Order of Heaven, but also by the Patriarchal Order of earth throught the those Patriarchal Fathers lineally through all such who were righteous and had received them from father to son from the beginning, even down and through all the worthy Patriarchs and their descendants by right even to the Messiah himself to fulfill all righteousness.

Judah was not the hier, nor was he the faithful Patriarch whose right it was to be ancestor to the Messiah. Only in the magnanimous performance of one man did any consideration of Judah come in. And it came in as to further "hid Christ in God" from the world and the Jews that they, by their total lack of understanding, would reject and crucify the God of Israel.

1) They are three set apart verses from the later verses concerning Joseph Smith, so why are they divided from each other if they concern but one person and not two separate persons as well?

2) If one studies the original 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon the later Joseph Smith sentence structuring has been changed by Orson Pratt's scripturalization of the Book of Mormon text into numbered verses and shorted chapters from the paragraph style of the original book. And in doing so, even in today's Book of Mormon are the versed corrupted rendering has obscured a well formed bookend classical chiasmus prophetical stand alone testimony of the prophet Joseph Smith.

3) In the JST, that information through the 'wisdom' of Joseph Smith is no longer in that prophetic classical 'Jewish' chiasmus form, for indeed Joseph Smith knew nothing of such prophetice style as held in ancient Israel.

4) If one accepts these many other evidences then it ought to be expected to be here to find verse that do speak of the coming of the Messiah from Joseph, even if so candidly spoken. And actually it is.

5) Why go to the bother of stating which of the branches of Joseph are 'not the Messiah' if you are not going to logically follow up some statement about which branch of Joseph is that of the Messiah?

Given these and likely other reasons, the objective mind ought to at least that the time of an honest effort to determine the matter. Or will we be given that we are to persist and continue in or ignoring and possible if not likely ignorance of the Patriarchal Order of the rightful descent of Jesus Christ? Here we will continue to further discuss the matter of the idea that Jesus is Messiah ben David as well as Messiah ben Joseph and thus one in the same Messiah. And that until one authorized to speak for the Church call me to repentance and tells me it is not true and that to remain in good standing in the Lord's Church I am to stop. And then I would for sure stop and withdraw the matter, as the Church is certainly that of God's one true Church.

   Now, in their order, Joseph has introduced the descent of the notable Patriarchs who are next to come from the Patriarchal blessings of the fathers. He has spoken of Jesus Christ and of Moses who likened unto Christ, who is to 'father,' gatherer, and deliver of Israel out of that bondage that they have fallen into in Egypt. From father Lehi's perspective that Moses had aready come and been noted, he leaves Moses out for the time being. Further from that persective of Moses gathering Israel and bringing them forth to their land of promise, the next considerations of the branches of Joseph chronologically comes to those who are to become scattered. And thus also they are so covered as a latter-day 'branch' of Joseph broken off from 'scattered Israel' and brought to that land of promise unto Joseph.

So when does Joseph begin to speak of Joseph Smith? That is in the JST verse 30 and Lehi's rendering in verse 11. And the verbal 'dividing' from that spoken of and presented before is noticabel in those connecting conjunction which basically state, 'and yet again." That is those that say, 'But, And again.' That is, "And again, a [5] seer will I raise up out of the fruit of thy loins;". And this time it is that individual branch of Joseph that is the latter-day Patriarch of the Restoration, Joseph Smith, who is also of the fruit of the lions of Joseph.

So now, after speaking of those other four (4) branches, three specifically spoken of and Lehi's group alluded to, even including those so scattered promised descendants of Joseph of Egypt as being that 'Righteous Branch' of the latter days which comes from the Gentiles of Europe, and which also includes all such portions of those scattered still remaining in Europe as further 'branch(es).' And of that 'prophet' of Joseph's house who was Moses come to 'gather Israel out of Egypt and unto their land of promise;' and also speaking of the Blessed Messiah, who is the promised seed of the everylasting covenant birthright, which Joseph of Egypt held as to the preserved blessings of the fathers (D&C 27:10); we come to 'But—And again' a seer who is Joseph Smith, the promised seer of Joseph's seed who would be the prophet of the restoration in the latter days. These are they of the promise of the Patriarchal Order of Patriarchs, Adam, Noah, Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus, and Joseph Smith. That is 'Seven Heads' and positioned leaders of the Lord's people from Adam to Joseph Smith that are of the same Patriarchal Order who have taken the responsiblity for the Lord's people under their wings and provided for them. For some reason it reminds one of the seven lamps or candlestick of the Menorah as also seen of John in Revelation.

It would seem, and most certainly is, that every holder of those earthly rightfully passed down keys of the priesthood of the everlasting covenant, needed to be of the 'seed' of the everlasting covenant birthright, that is of the Partriarchal Order. Those who were the latter day 'heirs' of that priesthood, including Joseph Smith and even others of the gospel restoration membership were proclaimed heirs of that higher priesthood pertaining to the priesthood keys. Elias who restored the keys of the gospel and covenant of Abraham, which some identify as Noah, the same as Gabriel, certainly would hold right to those fathers' held keys.

It has even pointed out where Moses did get his such covenant bound keys. And that it was according to his being the adoptive son of Ephraim as here is explained that he came to hold the keys of the gathering of Israel, which he passed on to Joseph Smith in the Kirtland Temple? And of course Elijah was but a the righteous prophet of the kingdom of Ephraim who once considered himself but the last of the worthy priesthood holders in the kingdom and the potential patriachs except that Israel stood not worthy. And it was he that passed to Joseph the keys of the sealing and binding powers of heaven which he did carry.

And then, there is the matter of Jesus Christ. Certainly as the Son of God and as Jehovah the God of the Old Testament, it was indeed his priesthood and right under heaven to those very keys and priesthood. He was and is second only to the Father of Heaven, Adam being next after him in the Heavenly Order. Yet what of him in the earthly order of the Patriarchs after the fall.

Thus recall, even he descended below all things in order to fulfill all righteousness he did humbly submit to being baptized of John, not for the remission of sin, for he was without sin. But he did conform to all the earthly laws of God of the Jews is all of there their performance as well so instituted of and by himself as Jehovah, by him acting in the stead of the Father, thus foreshadowing himself. And so also would not one suspect that in the matter of the right to the earthly descent of the priesthood according to the everlasting covenant preserved by the birthright decent even the very Patriarchal Order; that he, even Christ, would so conform to the earthly bound requirement to be the 'seed' of the birthright covenant in order to the be earthly heir of the priesthood and the right to the keys of the Patriarchs of the Patriarchal Order, in order to fulfill all righteousness? And so he was that legal and lawful heir of Joseph as well.

And so it was. All these, including Joseph Smith, who was to be the latter-day holder of the keys of the birthright covenant; they all had there descent from the birthright lineage of Joseph the son of Jacob, as further came by his birthright son Ephraim who Jacob had made his own. How else was it to be that the Rod, the Branch of Isaiah 11 and D&C 113:1-4 to have been lineally a partly a descendant of Jesse, as well as of Ephraim of the house of Joseph?

It said nothing there about the Branch and Rod, Who had come and grown out from the stem of Jesse of who the first 5 verses of Isaiah 11 did speak, as being a descendant of the house of Judah. That is because according to the Laws of God as set forth by Moses, it was Obed, Jesse, David and even Jesus that were not legally or rightfully of the house of Judah according to the birthright everlasting covenant. Boaz had but been the willing maternally related surrogate performing kinsman who by Mahlon's wife Ruth, did raise up seed unto the dead house of Mahlon, Elimelech and Naomi. Obed was that son of that house that did not leave Naomi barren and sonless. And Obed was raised up to be the seed of the house of Mahlon, Elimelech and even Chilion, who were Ephrathites meaning Ephraimites of the tribe of Israel and of that legal right and lineage of the birthright everlasting covenant of that priesthood of God. Jesse was the son of Obed. Obed was the son of Mahlon. Mahlon was the son of Elimelech. And Elimelech would have been the heir of Jehosuha or Joshua, the son of Nun. And he was the heir of Ephraim by the hand of Moses, who was also so adopted into the house of Joseph. And thenc Joseph and of Jacob and of Isaac and of Abraham, and even thence down from the fathers from Adam to Noah to Abraham had the Covenant Birthright of the Firstborn of the Patriarchal Order come. And considering Melchizedek to be the same as Shem, it is by and from him that Abraham had gained his right unto the birthright everlasting covenant of the fathers which included the ancestry to the promised Blessed Messiah.

[JST verse 31 / Lehi verse 12 speaks of the of the Stick of Joseph, represented by the Book of Mormon, of which Mormon was the primary compiler, abridger and writer. The verse also includes the Stick of Judah and how the two sticks come together as one to confound the contentions of the false doctrines to bring the people to the knowledge of the truth.]

[Of interest, Joseph Smith Jr. was the chosen heir of the keys of the priesthood, including being that Chosen Patriarch of the Patriarchal Order descended from Joseph of Egypt to stand over the people of the Lord of the latter-days. Yet in honor of his own father, Joseph Smith Sr., he blessed him to be the Patriarch of the Church, who would give Patriarchal blessings to the members of the Church.]

In Chiasmic verse in Book of Mormon from the plates of brass as presented is set off with two bookends of a beginning 'quote' of 'And thus prophesied Joseph, saying:' to an ending 'quote' of 'Yea, thus prophesied Joseph.' Muddled perhaps by the original printers and further by Orson Pratts scriptural verse divisions and even the latter-day version's such arrangements; the Chiasm as likely either copied from the plates of brass or recited and remembered by those of the seed of Lehi, is to be found.