|
|
|
CHAPTER 25
Judges prescribe punishment for wicked—Marriage law provides for brother's widow—Just weights and measures required—Israel commanded to blot out Amalekites from under heaven. |
Judges are to presribe punishment for wicked—God's Marriage Law not only provides for widows in Israel but also for the continuation of the legal and rightful seed of the dead who would otherwise no longer have posterity in Israel—Powers of procreation protected—Amalekites ripened in wickedness to be blotted out under heaven. | |
  1 IF there be a acontroversy between men,
and they come unto bjudgment, that the judges may
judge them; then they shall cjustify the righteous, and
condemn the wicked.
  2 And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be abeaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his fault, by a certain bnumber.   3 aForty stripes he may give him, and not exceed: lest, if he should exceed, and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem bvile unto thee.
|
1a
TG
Disputations b Ezek. 44:24 c TG Justification 2a Luke 12:48 b IE of stripes (see next verse) 3a 2 Cor. 11:24 b OR degraded
|
|
  4 ¶ Thou shalt not amuzzle the
oxa when he treadeth out the
bcorn.
|
4a Thou shalt not muzzle the ox The care of the Lord is kindness to all of God's creatures. Crulty to animals is not tolerated by God and men who mistreat them are not pleasing unto God. Animals have been place under man's dominion, but like the dominion which man is to use in exercising the priesthood, it is done with love, persuasion, and with no acts of compulsion. |
4a
1 Cor. 9:9;
1 Tim. 5:18 b IE grain
|
God's Law of the Firstborn SonSignificant to the ancestory of Jesus Christ is this Law of Moses, which is the Law of God, concerning the legal and rightful descendantcy and heirship within the House of Israel. Christ was the Firstborn Son of God the Father of the spirit children of God. Ephraim is the Firstborn of God (Jeremiah 31:9) in Israel and Obed was the Firstborn of Ruth by Boaz as Boaz performed the part of the 'brother' who would raise up seed to the dead, who was Mahlon the Ephrathite, the first husband of Ruth. |
||
  5 ¶ If brethren dwell together, and one of them
die, and have no child, the awife of the dead shall not
marry bwithout unto a stranger: her
chusband's dbrother shall go in unto her,
and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an
ehusband's brother unto her.
  6 And it shall be, that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the aname of his brother which is deada, that his bname be not cput out of Israel.
|
6a that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother which is dead Boaz married Ruth, the wife of Mahlon the Ephrathite, in order to raise up seed to the dead according to this Law of God (Ruth 4:10). Why the Jewish compiled Bible sets forth the linage of Boaz as that of Obed, the firstborn son of Ruth who was to be raised up to the dead instead of the legal and rightful descent according to the Law of God can be speculated. By the time of the compilation of the Bible by the Jews after the Babylonian captivity, Israel, that is Ephraim had been lost in the eyes of the Jews who refused to even recognize the remaining mixed remnant of the tribe of Ephraim which was in the land of Samria. Further, Judah and the Jews, had always envied the right of the firstborn which had been bestowed upon Joseph and then upon Ephraim by the hand of Jacob. Thus for whatever reason, the record of the Jews has failed to recognize the Law of God, the Law of Moses, as to Obed's rightful linage being Mahlon and Elimelech, Ephrathites. And the Jews have preferred to give the surrogate blood linage of Obed to be that of the house of David than to give the rightful and legal heirship linage that the seed of Mahlon and Elimelech not be blotted out of the House of Israel. It seems only appropriate that it should now be restored to the rightful linage to which it belongs. |
5a
TG
Widows b OR outside the family c Ruth 1:11; Ruth 3:12 d Ruth 4:5; Matt. 22:24 (23-33); Mark 12:19; Luke 20:28 (27-38); Gen. 29:15 e TG Marriage, Fatherhood 6a Ruth 4:6; TG Name b Ruth 4:10 c HEB blotted
|
  7 And if the man like not to take his brother's
wife, then let his brother's wife go up to the gate unto the elders, and say,
My husband's brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel,
he will not perform the duty of my husband's
brothera.
  8 Then the elders of his city shall call him, and speak unto him: and if he astand to it, and say, I like not to take her;   9 Then shall his brother's wife come unto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his ashoe from off his foot, and spit in his face, and shall answer and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house.   10 And his name shall be called in Israel, The house of him that hath his shoe loosed.
|
7a perform the duty of my husband's brother Now in the case of the family of Elimelech the term 'brother' did include all near kinsmen as even Laban did call and refer to his nephew Jacob as his brother in the scriptures. And while it was likely that Peloni Almoni, the nearer kinsman was of the same tribe of Israel [Ephraim], that need not be the case of the maternally related Boaz, who was of the tribe of Judah though still an uncle relation and 'brother' under the law of the near kinsman's duty to perform unto Ruth to the end of raising up seed to the dead Mahlon and the house of Elimelech (See Ruth 4:5 & 10). |
8a
OR persists 9a Ruth 4:7 (6-8)
|
  11 ¶ When men strive together one with
anothera, and the wife of the one
draweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth
him, and putteth forth her hand, and
ataketh him by the secrets:
  12 Then thou shalt cut off her hand, thine eye shall not pity her.
|
11a men strive together one with another In the course of human events, men have often resorted to fight it out one with another. The Israelite perspective was that if two men were fighting it out between them, that the woman was not to interfer in a particular manner. It would seem that she could intervene in other ways for which there was no law but if she proceeded to do so in a particular manner which could result in the man's losing his ability to produce children, she would then receive a severe penalty. |
11a
Gen.
1:28
|
  13 ¶ Thou shalt not have in thy bag
adivers bweights, a great and a small.
  14 Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small.   15 But thou shalt have a aperfect and just weight, a perfect and just bmeasure shalt thou have: that thy days may be clengthened in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.   16 For all that do such things, and all that do unrighteously, are an abomination unto the LORD thy God.
|
13a
OR two kinds of (also v. 14) b Lev. 19:36 15a HEB full, whole b Lev. 19:36; Ezek. 45:10; Amos 8:5 c Deut. 4:40
|
|
  17 ¶ Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way, when ye were come forth out of Egypt;
  18 How he met thee by the way, and asmote the hindmost of thee, even all that were feeble behind thee, when thou wast faint and weary; and he feared not God.   19 Therefore it shall be, when the LORD thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt ablot out the remembrance of bAmalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it. |
18a
HEB attacked your rear 19a Alma 5:57 b Ex. 17:14 (8-16)
|